Publicação: Does Debt Relief Increase Fiscal Space in Zambia? The MDG Implications
Carregando...
Paginação
Primeira página
Última página
Data
Data de publicação
Data da Série
Data do evento
Data
Data de defesa
Data
Edição
Idioma
eng
Cobertura espacial
Cobertura temporal
País
Brasil
organization.page.location.country
Tipo de evento
Tipo
Grau Acadêmico
Fonte original
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
dARK
item.page.project.ID
item.page.project.productID
Detentor dos direitos autorais
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Development Programme
Acesso à informação
Acesso Aberto
Termos de uso
O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.
Titulo alternativo
item.page.organization.alternative
Variações no nome completo
Autor(a)
Orientador(a)
Editor(a)
Organizador(a)
Coordenador(a)
item.page.organization.manager
Outras autorias
Palestrante/Mediador(a)/Debatedor(a)
Coodenador do Projeto
Resumo
This Country Study critically examines fiscal policies in Zambia, particularly the effect of recent and projected debt relief on ‘fiscal space’. The study finds that due to associated policy conditionalities and other factors, H IPC debt relief will result in less fiscal space, rather than more. And projected G -8 debt relief w ill only marginally expand fiscal space. Part of the problem is that the Zambian government has little leew ay to choose its ow n fiscalpolicies, despite donor rhetoric about ‘nationalow nership’ ofpoverty-reduction policies. Draw ing on the analysis of a national study, the Country Study also estimates the additional public expenditures that w ould enable Zambia to reach the M DG s. In order to finance these expenditures, it proposes a diversified strategy of increasing tax revenue, expanding the fiscal deficit and obtaining more ODA. Finally, it recommends core elements of an expansionary macro framew ork that could support a seven per cent rate of economic growth (needed to attain M DG #1, i.e., halving extreme income poverty) and buttress the government’s effort to reach the other M DG s. In the process, it seeks to dispel common fears about the possible adverse effects of such fiscal expansion. (...)
