Publication: Participatory institutions and hybrid evidence : discussion, fertile relations, and ecology of knowledge
Loading...
item.page.format.extent
item.page.description.firstpage
item.page.description.lastpage
Date
Publication data
item.page.date.series
item.page.date.event
item.page.organization.date
item.page.date.submitted
item.page.project.date
item.page.description.edition
Language
eng
item.page.coverage.spatial
Brasil
item.page.coverage.temporal
item.page.location.country
BR
organization.page.location.country
item.page.type.events
item.page.type
item.page.degree.level
item.page.source.urlsource
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
dARK
item.page.project.ID
item.page.project.productID
Copyright Holder
Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea)
Access to Information
Acesso Aberto
Terms of Use
The reproduction of this text and the data contained therein is permitted, provided that the source is
acknowledged. Reproductions for commercial purposes are prohibited.
item.page.title.alternative
item.page.organization.alternative
item.page.name.variant
item.page.contributor.author
Advisor
item.page.contributor.editor
item.page.contributor.thesiscommitee
item.page.contributor.organizer
item.page.contributor.coordinator
item.page.contributor.other
item.page.relation.ispartofseries
Speaker / Moderator / Discussant
Abstract
Neste capítulo os autores argumentam que, por um lado, as IPs promovem a inclusão de subsídios baseados em diferentes formas de saber para a gestão de políticas públicas. Por outro lado, discutiremos como tais subsídios são debatidos, transformados e ressignificados para que seja possível gerar evidências híbridas, que são aquelas oriundas dos encontros, dos debates, das deliberações, dos acordos operacionalizáveis e dos conflitos manifestados nesses espaços. São conhecimentos que surgem das relações fecundas travadas por distintos atores, que dificilmente interagiriam fora das IPs (Abers e Keck, 2008).
item.page.description.abstractalternative
This chapter argues that, on the one hand, PIs promote the inclusion of support based on different forms of knowledge for the management of public policies. On the other hand, we will discuss how such tools are debated, transformed, and re-signified so that hybrid evidence, which is the evidence arising from meetings,
discussions, deliberations, operational agreements, and conflicts manifested in these spaces, can be generated. It is knowledge that arises from the fruitful relationships established between different actors, who would probably not interact outside the PIs.
organization.page.description
person.page.description
Email Address
person.page.identifier.orcid
person.page.identifier.lattes
person.page.identifier.gsid
person.page.identifier.rid
person.page.identifier.scopus-author-id
project.page.project.description
project.page.project.productdescription
item.page.subject.vcipea
item.page.subject.keyword
item.page.subject.otherlanguages
Citation
FONSECA, Igor Ferraz da et al. Participatory institutions and hybrid evidence: discussion, fertile relations, and ecology of knowledge. In: KOGA, Natália Massaco (Org.). Public policy and use of evidence in Brazil : concepts, methods, contexts and practices. Brasília, DF: Ipea, 2024. p. 133-160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.38116/978-65-5635-070-7/chapter6