Publication:
Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes and Gender Vulnerabilities: Case Studies of Brazil, Chile and Colombia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

item.page.format.extent

item.page.description.firstpage

item.page.description.lastpage

Date

Publication data

item.page.date.series

item.page.date.event

item.page.organization.date

item.page.date.submitted

item.page.project.date

item.page.description.edition

Language

eng

item.page.coverage.spatial

item.page.coverage.temporal

item.page.location.country

Brasil

organization.page.location.country

item.page.type.events

item.page.type

item.page.degree.level

item.page.source.urlsource

ISBN

ISSN

DOI

dARK

item.page.project.ID

item.page.project.productID

Copyright Holder

International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme

Access to Information

Acesso Aberto

Terms of Use

O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.

item.page.title.alternative

item.page.organization.alternative

item.page.name.variant

item.page.contributor.author

Advisor

item.page.contributor.editor

item.page.contributor.thesiscommitee

item.page.contributor.organizer

item.page.contributor.coordinator

item.page.contributor.other

item.page.relation.ispartofseries

Speaker / Moderator / Discussant

Abstract

This paper analyses Brazilian, Chilean and Colombian experiences with conditional cash transfer programmes and how they have helped tackle gendered economic and social vulnerabilities. It is argued that Bolsa Família, Chile Solidario and Familias en Acción should be analysed within the broader social protection strategies in which they are meant to be components. Such an approach can help generate thinking on ways to improve the impacts of the programmes in terms of gender equality. A detailed description of the programmes’ design and implementation features is provided in order to understand both their rationale and their impacts. We conclude that the programmes do tackle a number of gendered vulnerabilities but also have clear limits with regard to a more decisive role in tackling gender inequities. (...)

item.page.description.abstractalternative

organization.page.description

person.page.description

Email Address

person.page.identifier.orcid

person.page.identifier.lattes

person.page.identifier.gsid

person.page.identifier.rid

person.page.identifier.scopus-author-id

project.page.project.description

project.page.project.productdescription

item.page.subject.vcipea

item.page.subject.otherlanguages

Citation

item.page.description.version

Description

item.page.description.series

item.page.relation.replaces

Final version of this publication

item.page.relation.references

organization.page.relation.references

Book Chapter

Primary Version

Events

News

REPOSITÓRIO DO CONHECIMENTO DO IPEA
Redes sociais