Osmani, Siddiq2024-10-032024-10-032005https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15241Martin Ravallion and Nanak Kakwani have reopened a debate in which they have been engaged for some time. I find myself in agreement with both – not with their definitions of pro-poor growth, but with their criticisms of each other. That is to say, I find both their definitions problematic. (...)Martin Ravallion e Nanak Kakwani reabriram um debate do qual haviam se ocupado por algumengAcesso AbertoDefining pro-poor growthHacia una Definición de Crecimiento Económico Favorable a los PobresDéfinition de la croissance favorable aux pauvresDefinindo o Crescimento Pró-PobresWorking paperInternational Policy Centre for Inclusive GrowthUnited Nations Development ProgrammeLicença total exclusivaO texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.Povertypro-poor