Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15260
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
en_WP192_Do_economics_and_political_science_scholars_differ_on_public_choice_issues.pdf | 337.11 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | Do economics and political Science scholars differ on public choice issues? Survey evidence from Brazil |
Authors: | Nawar, Abdel-Hameed |
Abstract: | This Working Paper analyses the results of a novel survey carried out to examine and measure how Brazilian scholars of economics and political science—including public administration—tend to agree or disagree on main public choice issues. The conceptual framework identifies 34 issues across 7 representative thematic public choice areas, including assumptions about political actors, normative beliefs about government and voting, elections and economic performance, political parties, platforms, voting and preferences, size of government, individual behaviour (voting-with-feet and free riding), and finally government and the market. The survey results find that the Brazilian political science scholars have relatively higher tendency to agree on public choice issues than economics scholars. |
metadata.dc.rights.holder: | International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth United Nations Development Programme |
metadata.dc.rights.license: | O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas. |
metadata.dc.type: | Working Paper |
Appears in Collections: | Publicações do IPC-IG |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.