Publication:
Operational Poverty Targeting In Peru – Proxy Means Testing With Non-Income Indicators

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

item.page.format.extent

item.page.description.firstpage

item.page.description.lastpage

Date

Publication data

item.page.date.series

item.page.date.event

item.page.organization.date

item.page.date.submitted

item.page.project.date

item.page.description.edition

Language

eng

item.page.coverage.spatial

item.page.coverage.temporal

item.page.location.country

Brasil

organization.page.location.country

item.page.type.events

item.page.type

item.page.degree.level

item.page.source.urlsource

ISBN

ISSN

DOI

dARK

item.page.project.ID

item.page.project.productID

Copyright Holder

International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme

Access to Information

Acesso Aberto

Terms of Use

O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.

item.page.title.alternative

item.page.organization.alternative

item.page.name.variant

item.page.contributor.author

Advisor

item.page.contributor.editor

item.page.contributor.thesiscommitee

item.page.contributor.organizer

item.page.contributor.coordinator

item.page.contributor.other

item.page.relation.ispartofseries

Speaker / Moderator / Discussant

Abstract

The measurement of per capita daily expenditures relative to a monetary poverty line, also known as ‘sophisticated means testing’, is the most widely used approach to poverty assessment. However, it is reliant on the implementation of time- and cost-intensive household surveys. Hence, for operational purposes, it is not an effective method for targeting poor households with development services. This paper shows how to identify an alternative poverty assessment tool for Peru. The tool consists of a maximum of 15 indicators that are powerful predictors of per capita household expenditures. The indicators were selected out of a wide range of indicators used to gauge different poverty dimensions. The resultant poverty classification of households is based on the ‘percent point function’ of the predicted expenditures and validated by various accuracy measures and their confidence intervals. The results reveal that the 15 indicators correctly identify over 81 per cent of poor households when the national poverty line is employed as the benchmark. Thus, this tool might be considered, under certain conditions, as an alternative to the collection of detailed expenditure data. It offers an operational instrument for fairly accurate ex-ante poverty targeting and ex-post impact assessments.

item.page.description.abstractalternative

organization.page.description

person.page.description

Email Address

person.page.identifier.orcid

person.page.identifier.lattes

person.page.identifier.gsid

person.page.identifier.rid

person.page.identifier.scopus-author-id

project.page.project.description

project.page.project.productdescription

item.page.subject.vcipea

item.page.subject.otherlanguages

Citation

item.page.description.version

Description

item.page.description.series

item.page.relation.replaces

Final version of this publication

item.page.relation.references

organization.page.relation.references

Book Chapter

Primary Version

Events

News

REPOSITÓRIO DO CONHECIMENTO DO IPEA
Redes sociais