Publicação: Operational Poverty Targeting In Peru – Proxy Means Testing With Non-Income Indicators
Carregando...
Paginação
Primeira página
Última página
Data
Data de publicação
Data da Série
Data do evento
Data
Data de defesa
Data
Edição
Idioma
eng
Cobertura espacial
Cobertura temporal
País
Brasil
organization.page.location.country
Tipo de evento
Tipo
Grau Acadêmico
Fonte original
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
dARK
item.page.project.ID
item.page.project.productID
Detentor dos direitos autorais
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Development Programme
Acesso à informação
Acesso Aberto
Termos de uso
O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.
Titulo alternativo
item.page.organization.alternative
Variações no nome completo
Autor(a)
Orientador(a)
Editor(a)
Organizador(a)
Coordenador(a)
item.page.organization.manager
Outras autorias
Palestrante/Mediador(a)/Debatedor(a)
Coodenador do Projeto
Resumo
The measurement of per capita daily expenditures relative to a monetary poverty line, also known as ‘sophisticated means testing’, is the most widely used approach to poverty assessment. However, it is reliant on the implementation of time- and cost-intensive household surveys. Hence, for operational purposes, it is not an effective method for targeting poor households with development services. This paper shows how to identify an alternative poverty assessment tool for Peru. The tool consists of a maximum of 15 indicators that are powerful predictors of per capita household expenditures. The indicators were selected out of a wide range of indicators used to gauge different poverty dimensions. The resultant poverty classification of households is based on the ‘percent point function’ of the predicted expenditures and validated by various accuracy measures and their confidence intervals. The results reveal that the 15 indicators correctly identify over 81 per cent of poor households when the national poverty line is employed as the benchmark. Thus, this tool might be considered, under certain conditions, as an alternative to the collection of detailed expenditure data. It offers an operational instrument for fairly accurate ex-ante poverty targeting and ex-post impact assessments.
