Publication:
Adjusting Biofuel Policies to Meet Social and Rural Development Needs: Analysing the Experiences of Brazil, India and Indonesia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

item.page.format.extent

item.page.description.firstpage

item.page.description.lastpage

Date

Publication data

item.page.date.series

item.page.date.event

item.page.organization.date

item.page.date.submitted

item.page.project.date

item.page.description.edition

Language

eng

item.page.coverage.spatial

item.page.coverage.temporal

item.page.location.country

Brasil

organization.page.location.country

item.page.type.events

item.page.type

item.page.degree.level

item.page.source.urlsource

ISBN

ISSN

DOI

dARK

item.page.project.ID

item.page.project.productID

Copyright Holder

International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme

Access to Information

Acesso Aberto

Terms of Use

O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.

item.page.title.alternative

item.page.organization.alternative

item.page.name.variant

item.page.contributor.author

Advisor

item.page.contributor.editor

item.page.contributor.thesiscommitee

item.page.contributor.organizer

item.page.contributor.coordinator

item.page.contributor.other

item.page.relation.ispartofseries

Speaker / Moderator / Discussant

Abstract

This brief examines the social dimensions of the rapid expansion of biofuels as a key element of ‘green economies’ in the making. It compares three different contexts (Brazil, India and Indonesia) in the developing world, where biofuels have been often promoted under the arguments of poverty alleviation, social inclusion and rural development. The assessment reveals a general mismatch between the social discourse and the biofuel policy instruments adopted. Benefits to poor people in rural areas have been very limited, and far too often they have been left worse off after being incorporated in biofuel production chains under disadvantageous conditions. Better outcomes depend crucially on: (i) building on traditional livelihoods, rather than attempting to replace them; (ii) involving social movements in policy- and decision-making to ensure due consideration of the needs and interests of poor people in rural areas; and (iii) inserting provisions that allow smallholders to climb up the value chain, thus addressing the inequality structures that keep poor people poor. (…)

item.page.description.abstractalternative

organization.page.description

person.page.description

Email Address

person.page.identifier.orcid

person.page.identifier.lattes

person.page.identifier.gsid

person.page.identifier.rid

person.page.identifier.scopus-author-id

project.page.project.description

project.page.project.productdescription

item.page.subject.vcipea

item.page.subject.otherlanguages

Citation

item.page.description.version

Description

item.page.description.series

item.page.relation.replaces

Final version of this publication

item.page.relation.references

organization.page.relation.references

Book Chapter

Primary Version

Events

News

REPOSITÓRIO DO CONHECIMENTO DO IPEA
Redes sociais