Publicação: Adjusting Biofuel Policies to Meet Social and Rural Development Needs: Analysing the Experiences of Brazil, India and Indonesia
Carregando...
Paginação
Primeira página
Última página
Data
Data de publicação
Data da Série
Data do evento
Data
Data de defesa
Data
Edição
Idioma
eng
Cobertura espacial
Cobertura temporal
País
Brasil
organization.page.location.country
Tipo de evento
Tipo
Grau Acadêmico
Fonte original
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
dARK
item.page.project.ID
item.page.project.productID
Detentor dos direitos autorais
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Development Programme
Acesso à informação
Acesso Aberto
Termos de uso
O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.
Titulo alternativo
item.page.organization.alternative
Variações no nome completo
Autor(a)
Orientador(a)
Editor(a)
Organizador(a)
Coordenador(a)
item.page.organization.manager
Outras autorias
Palestrante/Mediador(a)/Debatedor(a)
Coodenador do Projeto
Resumo
This brief examines the social dimensions of the rapid expansion of biofuels as a key element of ‘green economies’ in the making. It compares three different contexts (Brazil, India and Indonesia) in the developing world, where biofuels have been often promoted under the arguments of poverty alleviation, social inclusion and rural development. The assessment reveals a general mismatch between the social discourse and the biofuel policy instruments adopted. Benefits to poor people in rural areas have been very limited, and far too often they have been left worse off after being incorporated in biofuel production chains under disadvantageous conditions. Better outcomes depend crucially on: (i) building on traditional livelihoods, rather than attempting to replace them; (ii) involving social movements in policy- and decision-making to ensure due consideration of the needs and interests of poor people in rural areas; and (iii) inserting provisions that allow smallholders to climb up the value chain, thus addressing the inequality structures that keep poor people poor. (…)
