Publicação: Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS
Carregando...
Paginação
Primeira página
Última página
Data
item.page.date.journal
Data da Série
Data do evento
Data
Data de defesa
Data
Edição
Idioma
eng
Cobertura espacial
Cobertura temporal
País
Brasil
organization.page.location.country
Tipo de evento
Tipo
Grau Acadêmico
Fonte original
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
dARK
item.page.project.ID
item.page.project.productID
Detentor dos direitos autorais
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Development Programme
Acesso à informação
Acesso Aberto
Termos de uso
O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.
Titulo alternativo
item.page.organization.alternative
Variações no nome completo
Orientador(a)
Editor(a)
Organizador(a)
Coordenador(a)
item.page.organization.manager
Outras autorias
Palestrante/Mediador(a)/Debatedor(a)
Coodenador do Projeto
Resumo
The BRICS Grouping (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and the IBSA Dialogue Forum (India, Brazil and South Africa)represent interregional cooperative mechanisms of increasing importance in international relations. This can be attributed to the recent rise of the global South, placing unprecedented emphasis on South–South cooperation. With three members in common, the necessity for and contribution of both IBSA and BRICS are often called into question. IBSA’s two-year successive postponement of its annual summit, five of which have taken place thus far, has prompted questions regarding the continued relevance of an organisation which in many ways is viewed as duplicating the functions of BRICS. Combined with the fact that BRICS contains the political-economic weight of Russia and China (permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Nuclear Superpowers), the future of IBSA is doubted by some. To determine the future of IBSA, it is important to examine how it differs from BRICS in terms of capacity, priorities and political character. (…)
