Publication: A Substitute for Substitution: Bolsa Família’s Effects on the Combination of Work and School for Children and Adolescents Aged 10–18
Loading...
item.page.format.extent
item.page.description.firstpage
item.page.description.lastpage
Date
Publication data
item.page.date.series
item.page.date.event
item.page.organization.date
item.page.date.submitted
item.page.project.date
item.page.description.edition
Language
eng
item.page.coverage.spatial
item.page.coverage.temporal
item.page.location.country
Brasil
organization.page.location.country
item.page.type.events
item.page.type
item.page.degree.level
item.page.source.urlsource
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
dARK
item.page.project.ID
item.page.project.productID
Copyright Holder
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Development Programme
Access to Information
Acesso Aberto
Terms of Use
O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.
item.page.title.alternative
إحلال الإحلال : آثار بولسا فاميليا على مزيج العمل و الدراسة للأطفال والمراهقين الذين تتراوح أعمارهم بين 18-10, Un Sustituto para la Sustitución: los Efectos del Programa Bolsa Familia en la Combinación de Trabajo y Escuela entre Niños y Adolescentes de 10 a 18 años, Un substitut pour la substitution: Les effets de Bolsa Família sur la combinaison travail et école chez les enfants et les adolescents de 10 à 18 ans, Um Substituto para a Substituição: “Os Efeitos da Combinação Trabalho e Escola do Bolsa Família sobre as Crianças e Adolescentes com Idades de 10 a 18 Anos"
item.page.organization.alternative
item.page.name.variant
item.page.contributor.author
Advisor
item.page.contributor.editor
item.page.contributor.thesiscommitee
item.page.contributor.organizer
item.page.contributor.coordinator
item.page.contributor.other
item.page.relation.ispartofseries
Speaker / Moderator / Discussant
Abstract
Evidence suggests that insufficient household income can lead to labour supplementation by children and adolescents. The pressure on them to enter the labour market results in less time available for school activities and, ultimately, in school drop-out. Thus most impact evaluations of conditional or unconditional cash transfer programmes tend to pay special attention to programmes’ impacts on children’s and adolescents’ school attendance and participation in the labour market. In a cyclical fashion, the so called ‘substitution effect’ of work for school reproduces a reality experienced by low-income parents, derived from low schooling levels, for future generation
Evidence suggests that insufficient household income can lead to labour supplementation by children and adolescents. The pressure on them to enter the labour market results in less time available for school activities and, ultimately, in school drop-out. Thus most impact evaluations of conditional or unconditional cash transfer programmes tend to pay special attention to programmes’ impacts on children’s and adolescents’ school attendance and participation in the labour market. In a cyclical fashion, the so called ‘substitution effect’ of work for school reproduces a reality experienced by low-income parents, derived from low schooling levels, for future generation
Evidence suggests that insufficient household income can lead to labour supplementation by children and adolescents. The pressure on them to enter the labour market results in less time available for school activities and, ultimately, in school drop-out. Thus most impact evaluations of conditional or unconditional cash transfer programmes tend to pay special attention to programmes’ impacts on children’s and adolescents’ school attendance and participation in the labour market. In a cyclical fashion, the so called ‘substitution effect’ of work for school reproduces a reality experienced by low-income parents, derived from low schooling levels, for future generation