Publicação: No Child Left Without: a Universal Benefit for Children in Brazil
Carregando...
Paginação
Primeira página
Última página
Data
item.page.date.journal
Data da Série
Data do evento
Data
Data de defesa
Data
Edição
Idioma
eng
Cobertura espacial
Cobertura temporal
País
Brasil
organization.page.location.country
Tipo de evento
Tipo
Grau Acadêmico
Fonte original
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
dARK
item.page.project.ID
item.page.project.productID
Detentor dos direitos autorais
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Development Programme
Acesso à informação
Acesso Aberto
Termos de uso
O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.
Titulo alternativo
Ningún Niño sin Beneficios: Asignaciones Universales por Hijos en Brasil
item.page.organization.alternative
Variações no nome completo
Orientador(a)
Editor(a)
Organizador(a)
Coordenador(a)
item.page.organization.manager
Outras autorias
Palestrante/Mediador(a)/Debatedor(a)
Coodenador do Projeto
Resumo
Support for children needs little justification. They are the most vulnerable population group, they are the future, and they did not choose the circumstances of their birth. Support can be channelled either through direct provision of goods and services, such as education and health care for children, or can take the form of financial support for families. Transfers to families for children have been in the policy limelight since Bolsa Família and other Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) appeared on the policy landscape. What is not so well known is that Bolsa Família is only one of three Brazilian cash transfers to families for their children. The other two are the Salário Família and the deduction for minor dependents in Personal Income Tax. We will show here that this system is fragmented, leaves a third of children without coverage, and transfers higher amounts to wealthier families. We propose the unification of the three benefits into a single universal child benefit, which would be far more transparent and fair, without compromising fiscal responsibility. (...)