Publication: Do economics and political Science scholars differ on public choice issues? Survey evidence from Brazil
Loading...
item.page.format.extent
item.page.description.firstpage
item.page.description.lastpage
Date
Publication data
item.page.date.series
item.page.date.event
item.page.organization.date
item.page.date.submitted
item.page.project.date
item.page.description.edition
Language
eng
item.page.coverage.spatial
item.page.coverage.temporal
item.page.location.country
Brasil
organization.page.location.country
item.page.type.events
item.page.type
item.page.degree.level
item.page.source.urlsource
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
dARK
item.page.project.ID
item.page.project.productID
Copyright Holder
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Development Programme
Access to Information
Acesso Aberto
Terms of Use
O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.
item.page.title.alternative
item.page.organization.alternative
item.page.name.variant
item.page.contributor.author
Advisor
item.page.contributor.editor
item.page.contributor.thesiscommitee
item.page.contributor.organizer
item.page.contributor.coordinator
item.page.contributor.other
item.page.relation.ispartofseries
Speaker / Moderator / Discussant
Abstract
This Working Paper analyses the results of a novel survey carried out to examine and measure how Brazilian scholars of economics and political science—including public administration—tend to agree or disagree on main public choice issues. The conceptual framework identifies 34 issues across 7 representative thematic public choice areas, including assumptions about political actors, normative beliefs about government and voting, elections and economic performance, political parties, platforms, voting and preferences, size of government, individual behaviour (voting-with-feet and free riding), and finally government and the market. The survey results find that the Brazilian political science scholars have relatively higher tendency to agree on public choice issues than economics scholars.