Publicação: Distinguishing Chronic Poverty from Transient Poverty in Brazil: Developing a Model for Pseudo-Panel Data
Carregando...
Paginação
Primeira página
Última página
Data
Data de publicação
Data da Série
Data do evento
Data
Data de defesa
Data
Edição
Idioma
eng
Cobertura espacial
Cobertura temporal
País
Brasil
organization.page.location.country
Tipo de evento
Tipo
Grau Acadêmico
Fonte original
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
dARK
item.page.project.ID
item.page.project.productID
Detentor dos direitos autorais
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Development Programme
Acesso à informação
Acesso Aberto
Termos de uso
O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.
Titulo alternativo
item.page.organization.alternative
Variações no nome completo
Autor(a)
Orientador(a)
Editor(a)
Organizador(a)
Coordenador(a)
item.page.organization.manager
Outras autorias
Palestrante/Mediador(a)/Debatedor(a)
Coodenador do Projeto
Resumo
Although many studies have addressed poverty in Brazil, very few of them have analyzed the dynamic nature of this phenomenon. In order to fill this gap, this Working Paper seeks to identify the features that determine the permanence of poverty and the downward mobility into poverty of adults in urban areas. Due to the scarcity of Brazilian panel surveys, we use a ‘pseudo-panel’ obtained from PNAD, a cross-sectional National Household Survey. The probabilities of staying in states (poor or non-poor) and changing states (such as from poor to non-poor) are estimated with a bivariate probit for grouped data. Our analysis distinguishes between persistent and observed components that can condition the probability of being poor and helps identify the groups that are particularly affected by either transient or chronic poverty. We find that between 1995 and 2003, 73 per cent of urban relative poverty in Brazil was chronic and most of this level was due to an initial persistent condition of poverty. In other words, most poor people are subject to poverty mainly because of their past persistent condition of poverty. These findings suggest that an effective policy of reducing poverty should involve not only a systematic multi-sectoral approach, such as improving human capital and the access to public services, but also an extensive programme of income redistribution.
