Publication:
A history of inequality: top incomes in Brazil, 1926–2015

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

item.page.format.extent

item.page.description.firstpage

item.page.description.lastpage

Date

Publication data

item.page.date.series

item.page.date.event

item.page.organization.date

item.page.date.submitted

item.page.project.date

item.page.description.edition

Language

eng

item.page.coverage.spatial

item.page.coverage.temporal

item.page.location.country

Brasil

organization.page.location.country

item.page.type.events

item.page.type

item.page.degree.level

item.page.source.urlsource

ISBN

ISSN

DOI

dARK

item.page.project.ID

item.page.project.productID

Copyright Holder

International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme

Access to Information

Acesso Aberto

Terms of Use

O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.

item.page.title.alternative

item.page.organization.alternative

item.page.name.variant

item.page.contributor.author

Advisor

item.page.contributor.editor

item.page.contributor.thesiscommitee

item.page.contributor.organizer

item.page.contributor.coordinator

item.page.contributor.other

item.page.relation.ispartofseries

Speaker / Moderator / Discussant

Abstract

"This paper uses income tax tabulations to estimate top income shares in Brazil over the long term. Between 1926 and 2015, the concentration of income at the top remained very high, following a sine wave trend: top shares ebbed and flowed over time, frequently in tandem with political and institutional disruptions. There is some evidence in favour of Williamson's 'missed levelling' hypothesis regarding the origins of Latin America's exceptionally high levels of inequality, but the recent decline in inequality is cast in a more dubious light, since top income shares have remained quite stable since 2000 and the 'tax-adjusted' Gini coefficients show a smaller and shorter, though still sizeable, decrease. The nature of the political regime matters, but democracy is not a sufficient condition for redistribution. Brazil's tumultuous political history suggests top income shares change substantially mostly during political-institutional crises, when the typical quid pro quo of more liberal regimes in normal times collapses. The analysis is complemented by international comparisons and a discussion of the role of institutions in shaping inequality". (...)

item.page.description.abstractalternative

organization.page.description

person.page.description

Email Address

person.page.identifier.orcid

person.page.identifier.lattes

person.page.identifier.gsid

person.page.identifier.rid

person.page.identifier.scopus-author-id

project.page.project.description

project.page.project.productdescription

item.page.subject.vcipea

item.page.subject.keyword

item.page.subject.otherlanguages

Citation

item.page.description.version

Description

item.page.description.series

item.page.relation.replaces

Final version of this publication

item.page.relation.references

organization.page.relation.references

Book Chapter

Primary Version

Events

News

REPOSITÓRIO DO CONHECIMENTO DO IPEA
Redes sociais