Publication:
Fiscal Equity: Distributional Impacts of Taxation and Social Spending in Brazil

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

item.page.format.extent

item.page.description.firstpage

item.page.description.lastpage

Date

Publication data

item.page.date.series

item.page.date.event

item.page.organization.date

item.page.date.submitted

item.page.project.date

item.page.description.edition

Language

eng

item.page.coverage.spatial

item.page.coverage.temporal

item.page.location.country

Brasil

organization.page.location.country

item.page.type.events

item.page.type

item.page.degree.level

item.page.source.urlsource

ISBN

ISSN

DOI

dARK

item.page.project.ID

item.page.project.productID

Copyright Holder

International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme

Access to Information

Acesso Aberto

Terms of Use

O texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.

item.page.title.alternative

item.page.organization.alternative

item.page.name.variant

Advisor

item.page.contributor.editor

item.page.contributor.thesiscommitee

item.page.contributor.organizer

item.page.contributor.coordinator

item.page.contributor.other

item.page.relation.ispartofseries

Speaker / Moderator / Discussant

Abstract

In 2009, the Brazilian public sector — actually, the Union: including states, municipalities and the Federal District — collected approximately 35 per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP) in taxes, and ‘gave back’ around 15 per cent in pension and health benefits to the private sector and a substantially lower amount through subsidies. Approximately one third of this amount is used to pay the pensions of public servants. Consumption expenditures reached nearly 20 per cent of GDP, while expenditure on investment — ‘gross fixed capital’ — and the net interest payments to holders of government bonds accounted for 2.3 per cent and 5.4 per cent, respectively. Also of note in public budgets are the expenditures on education and health policies, which accounted for about 9 per cent of GDP in 2009. The analysis presented in this article shows the importance of assessing the distributional impacts on household income of taxes, social security and assistance transfers and the public provision of goods and services in education and health. That is the purpose of this study: to evaluate how primary household income changes through the intervention of social security and assistance, fiscal and public health and education policies. (…)

item.page.description.abstractalternative

organization.page.description

person.page.description

Email Address

person.page.identifier.orcid

person.page.identifier.lattes

person.page.identifier.gsid

person.page.identifier.rid

person.page.identifier.scopus-author-id

project.page.project.description

project.page.project.productdescription

item.page.subject.vcipea

item.page.subject.otherlanguages

Citation

item.page.description.version

Description

item.page.description.series

item.page.relation.replaces

Final version of this publication

item.page.relation.references

organization.page.relation.references

Book Chapter

Primary Version

Events

News

REPOSITÓRIO DO CONHECIMENTO DO IPEA
Redes sociais